Pi Pico 2W vs Teensy 4.0
Cortex-M33 (RP2350) at 150 MHz against Cortex-M7 (i.MX RT1062) at 600 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W
Cortex-M33 (RP2350)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Teensy 4.0
Cortex-M7 (i.MX RT1062)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Teensy 4.0
- Clock
- 600 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
6.34×
Teensy 4.0 faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W
0.26×
float modulo
Biggest win for Teensy 4.0
16.3×
uint64_t divide
Clock for clock
1.58×
Teensy 4.0 needs fewer cycles per op (4.00× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico 2W is than Teensy 4.0, operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico 2W ahead. Orange: Teensy 4.0 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/6.34× 12.2 M/s · 77.4 M/s | 1/6.17× 12.2 M/s · 75.3 M/s | 1/6.67× 11.3 M/s · 75.3 M/s | 1/5.51× 9.49 M/s · 52.3 M/s | 1/5.80× 7.97 M/s · 46.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/6.14× 12.3 M/s · 75.3 M/s | 1/6.15× 12.2 M/s · 75 M/s | 1/5.59× 12.3 M/s · 68.6 M/s | 1/4.77× 8.7 M/s · 41.5 M/s | 1/5.06× 7.4 M/s · 37.5 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/6.23× 13.3 M/s · 82.8 M/s | 1/6.42× 13.4 M/s · 85.7 M/s | 1/5.59× 12.3 M/s · 68.6 M/s | 1/4.28× 9.2 M/s · 39.3 M/s | 1/4.25× 8.19 M/s · 34.8 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1/6.42× 9.84 M/s · 63.2 M/s | 1/6.42× 9.84 M/s · 63.2 M/s | 1/5.34× 8.19 M/s · 43.7 M/s | 1/16.3× 340 k/s · 5.54 M/s | 1/16.3× 340 k/s · 5.54 M/s |
| float | 1/5.82× 13.4 M/s · 77.7 M/s | 1/5.82× 13.4 M/s · 77.7 M/s | 1/5.82× 13.4 M/s · 77.7 M/s | 1/4.20× 6.43 M/s · 27 M/s | 1/3.84× 1.74 M/s · 6.67 M/s |
| double | 1/9.81× 5.71 M/s · 56 M/s | 1/9.61× 5.69 M/s · 54.7 M/s | 1/12.6× 3.46 M/s · 43.7 M/s | 1/7.47× 2.1 M/s · 15.7 M/s | 1/3.97× 1.22 M/s · 4.84 M/s |