Teensy 4.0 vs PIC24FJ64GU205
Cortex-M7 (i.MX RT1062) at 600 MHz against PIC24F (PIC24FJ64GU205) at 32 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Teensy 4.0
Cortex-M7 (i.MX RT1062)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Teensy 4.0
- Clock
- 600 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
PIC24FJ64GU205
PIC24F (PIC24FJ64GU205)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- PIC24FJ64GU205 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 32 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Typical gap
188×
Teensy 4.0 faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Teensy 4.0
2,540×
uint64_t modulo
Closest cell
51.2×
double modulo
Clock for clock
10.0×
Teensy 4.0 needs fewer cycles per op (18.8× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Teensy 4.0 is than PIC24FJ64GU205, operations per second. Blue: Teensy 4.0 ahead. Orange: PIC24FJ64GU205 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 54.3× 77.4 M/s · 1.43 M/s | 52.8× 75.3 M/s · 1.43 M/s | 57.5× 75.3 M/s · 1.31 M/s | 105× 52.3 M/s · 497 k/s | 93.2× 46.3 M/s · 497 k/s |
| uint16_t | 65.7× 75.3 M/s · 1.15 M/s | 65.5× 75 M/s · 1.15 M/s | 59.9× 68.6 M/s · 1.15 M/s | 85.4× 41.5 M/s · 485 k/s | 77.3× 37.5 M/s · 485 k/s |
| uint32_t | 92.9× 82.8 M/s · 890 k/s | 96.3× 85.7 M/s · 890 k/s | 107× 68.6 M/s · 641 k/s | 1,146× 39.3 M/s · 34.3 k/s | 1,030× 34.8 M/s · 33.8 k/s |
| uint64_t | 110× 63.2 M/s · 572 k/s | 94.6× 63.2 M/s · 668 k/s | 329× 43.7 M/s · 133 k/s | 2,535× 5.54 M/s · 2.19 k/s | 2,540× 5.54 M/s · 2.18 k/s |
| float | 585× 77.7 M/s · 133 k/s | 639× 77.7 M/s · 122 k/s | 464× 77.7 M/s · 168 k/s | 345× 27 M/s · 78.2 k/s | 69.3× 6.67 M/s · 96.3 k/s |
| double | 432× 56 M/s · 130 k/s | 460× 54.7 M/s · 119 k/s | 269× 43.7 M/s · 162 k/s | 203× 15.7 M/s · 77.1 k/s | 51.2× 4.84 M/s · 94.5 k/s |