PIC24FJ64GU205 vs Teensy 4.0
PIC24F (PIC24FJ64GU205) at 32 MHz against Cortex-M7 (i.MX RT1062) at 600 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
PIC24FJ64GU205
PIC24F (PIC24FJ64GU205)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- PIC24FJ64GU205 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 32 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Teensy 4.0
Cortex-M7 (i.MX RT1062)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Teensy 4.0
- Clock
- 600 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
188×
Teensy 4.0 faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for PIC24FJ64GU205
0.02×
double modulo
Biggest win for Teensy 4.0
2,540×
uint64_t modulo
Clock for clock
10.0×
Teensy 4.0 needs fewer cycles per op (18.8× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster PIC24FJ64GU205 is than Teensy 4.0, operations per second. Blue: PIC24FJ64GU205 ahead. Orange: Teensy 4.0 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/54.3× 1.43 M/s · 77.4 M/s | 1/52.8× 1.43 M/s · 75.3 M/s | 1/57.5× 1.31 M/s · 75.3 M/s | 1/105× 497 k/s · 52.3 M/s | 1/93.2× 497 k/s · 46.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/65.7× 1.15 M/s · 75.3 M/s | 1/65.5× 1.15 M/s · 75 M/s | 1/59.9× 1.15 M/s · 68.6 M/s | 1/85.4× 485 k/s · 41.5 M/s | 1/77.3× 485 k/s · 37.5 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/92.9× 890 k/s · 82.8 M/s | 1/96.3× 890 k/s · 85.7 M/s | 1/107× 641 k/s · 68.6 M/s | 1/1,146× 34.3 k/s · 39.3 M/s | 1/1,030× 33.8 k/s · 34.8 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1/110× 572 k/s · 63.2 M/s | 1/94.6× 668 k/s · 63.2 M/s | 1/329× 133 k/s · 43.7 M/s | 1/2,535× 2.19 k/s · 5.54 M/s | 1/2,540× 2.18 k/s · 5.54 M/s |
| float | 1/585× 133 k/s · 77.7 M/s | 1/639× 122 k/s · 77.7 M/s | 1/464× 168 k/s · 77.7 M/s | 1/345× 78.2 k/s · 27 M/s | 1/69.3× 96.3 k/s · 6.67 M/s |
| double | 1/432× 130 k/s · 56 M/s | 1/460× 119 k/s · 54.7 M/s | 1/269× 162 k/s · 43.7 M/s | 1/203× 77.1 k/s · 15.7 M/s | 1/51.2× 94.5 k/s · 4.84 M/s |