Teensy 4.0 vs PIC16F17146
Cortex-M7 (i.MX RT1062) at 600 MHz against PIC16F (PIC16F17146) at 32 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Teensy 4.0
Cortex-M7 (i.MX RT1062)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Teensy 4.0
- Clock
- 600 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
PIC16F17146
PIC16F (PIC16F17146)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- PIC16F17146 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 32 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Typical gap
1,689×
Teensy 4.0 faster, geometric mean of 25 cells
Biggest win for Teensy 4.0
13,055×
float multiply
Closest cell
260×
uint8_t add
Clock for clock
90.1×
Teensy 4.0 needs fewer cycles per op (18.8× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Teensy 4.0 is than PIC16F17146, operations per second. Blue: Teensy 4.0 ahead. Orange: PIC16F17146 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 260× 77.4 M/s · 298 k/s | 272× 75.3 M/s · 277 k/s | 1,161× 75.3 M/s · 64.8 k/s | 844× 52.3 M/s · 62 k/s | 2,301× 46.3 M/s · 20.1 k/s |
| uint16_t | 309× 75.3 M/s · 244 k/s | 308× 75 M/s · 244 k/s | 2,701× 68.6 M/s · 25.4 k/s | 1,758× 41.5 M/s · 23.6 k/s | 1,373× 37.5 M/s · 27.3 k/s |
| uint32_t | 785× 82.8 M/s · 105 k/s | 963× 85.7 M/s · 89 k/s | 6,923× 68.6 M/s · 9.9 k/s | 4,263× 39.3 M/s · 9.23 k/s | 3,223× 34.8 M/s · 10.8 k/s |
| uint64_t | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| float | 3,121× 77.7 M/s · 24.9 k/s | 4,174× 77.7 M/s · 18.6 k/s | 13,055× 77.7 M/s · 5.95 k/s | 4,899× 27 M/s · 5.51 k/s | 910× 6.67 M/s · 7.33 k/s |
| double | 2,248× 56 M/s · 24.9 k/s | 2,937× 54.7 M/s · 18.6 k/s | 7,345× 43.7 M/s · 5.95 k/s | 2,846× 15.7 M/s · 5.51 k/s | 660× 4.84 M/s · 7.33 k/s |