PIC16F17146 vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
PIC16F (PIC16F17146) at 32 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
PIC16F17146
PIC16F (PIC16F17146)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- PIC16F17146 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 32 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
140×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) faster, geometric mean of 25 cells
Biggest win for PIC16F17146
0.02×
uint8_t add
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
1,141×
uint32_t multiply
Clock for clock
29.8×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) needs fewer cycles per op (4.69× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster PIC16F17146 is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: PIC16F17146 ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/41.0× 298 k/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/48.0× 277 k/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/205× 64.8 k/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/85.5× 62 k/s · 5.3 M/s | 1/263× 20.1 k/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/46.4× 244 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/46.4× 244 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/414× 25.4 k/s · 10.5 M/s | 1/210× 23.6 k/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/175× 27.3 k/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/116× 105 k/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/127× 89 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/1,141× 9.9 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/536× 9.23 k/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/457× 10.8 k/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| float | 1/97.6× 24.9 k/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/131× 18.6 k/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/500× 5.95 k/s · 2.98 M/s | 1/137× 5.51 k/s · 758 k/s | 1/156× 7.33 k/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 1/48.7× 24.9 k/s · 1.21 M/s | 1/66.7× 18.6 k/s · 1.24 M/s | 1/114× 5.95 k/s · 678 k/s | 1/71.5× 5.51 k/s · 394 k/s | 1/99.7× 7.33 k/s · 731 k/s |