Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) vs ESP32
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz against Xtensa LX6 (ESP32) at 240 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
1.62×
ESP32 faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
1.54×
uint64_t multiply
Biggest win for ESP32
5.02×
float divide
Clock for clock
1.01×
ESP32 needs fewer cycles per op (1.60× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) is than ESP32, operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead. Orange: ESP32 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1.07× 12.2 M/s · 11.4 M/s | 1.16× 13.3 M/s · 11.4 M/s | 1.17× 13.3 M/s · 11.4 M/s | 1/1.97× 5.3 M/s · 10.4 M/s | 1/1.89× 5.3 M/s · 10 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/1.01× 11.3 M/s · 11.4 M/s | 1/1.01× 11.3 M/s · 11.4 M/s | 1/1.09× 10.5 M/s · 11.4 M/s | 1/1.88× 4.94 M/s · 9.32 M/s | 1/1.87× 4.79 M/s · 8.97 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1.02× 12.2 M/s · 12 M/s | 1/1.06× 11.3 M/s · 12 M/s | 1/1.06× 11.3 M/s · 12 M/s | 1/2.02× 4.94 M/s · 10 M/s | 1/1.94× 4.94 M/s · 9.6 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1.16× 8.2 M/s · 7.05 M/s | 1.18× 8.2 M/s · 6.94 M/s | 1.54× 7.39 M/s · 4.79 M/s | 1/2.13× 822 k/s · 1.75 M/s | 1/2.13× 794 k/s · 1.69 M/s |
| float | 1/4.93× 2.43 M/s · 12 M/s | 1/4.93× 2.43 M/s · 12 M/s | 1/4.03× 2.98 M/s · 12 M/s | 1/5.02× 758 k/s · 3.8 M/s | 1/1.51× 1.14 M/s · 1.73 M/s |
| double | 1/2.44× 1.21 M/s · 2.96 M/s | 1/2.16× 1.24 M/s · 2.68 M/s | 1/2.75× 678 k/s · 1.86 M/s | 1/1.17× 394 k/s · 459 k/s | 1/1.51× 731 k/s · 1.11 M/s |