Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) vs MSP430FR2433
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz against MSP430FRx (MSP430FR2433) at 15.99 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
MSP430FR2433
MSP430FRx (MSP430FR2433)
- Family
- MSP430
- Board
- MSP-EXP430FR2433 LaunchPad
- Clock
- 15.99 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
78.9×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
720×
double multiply
Closest cell
17.5×
uint16_t add
Clock for clock
8.42×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) needs fewer cycles per op (9.38× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) is than MSP430FR2433, operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead. Orange: MSP430FR2433 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 19.7× 12.2 M/s · 621 k/s | 22.3× 13.3 M/s · 598 k/s | 46.0× 13.3 M/s · 290 k/s | 61.3× 5.3 M/s · 86.4 k/s | 61.6× 5.3 M/s · 86 k/s |
| uint16_t | 17.5× 11.3 M/s · 646 k/s | 18.2× 11.3 M/s · 622 k/s | 34.0× 10.5 M/s · 309 k/s | 73.5× 4.94 M/s · 67.3 k/s | 71.5× 4.79 M/s · 67 k/s |
| uint32_t | 33.1× 12.2 M/s · 370 k/s | 28.4× 11.3 M/s · 397 k/s | 53.9× 11.3 M/s · 210 k/s | 214× 4.94 M/s · 23.1 k/s | 215× 4.94 M/s · 23 k/s |
| uint64_t | 54.5× 8.2 M/s · 151 k/s | 59.8× 8.2 M/s · 137 k/s | 78.4× 7.39 M/s · 94.3 k/s | 203× 822 k/s · 4.06 k/s | 156× 794 k/s · 5.1 k/s |
| float | 144× 2.43 M/s · 16.8 k/s | 150× 2.43 M/s · 16.2 k/s | 508× 2.98 M/s · 5.85 k/s | 64.9× 758 k/s · 11.7 k/s | 53.8× 1.14 M/s · 21.3 k/s |
| double | 148× 1.21 M/s · 8.18 k/s | 159× 1.24 M/s · 7.8 k/s | 720× 678 k/s · 942 /s | 188× 394 k/s · 2.1 k/s | 83.2× 731 k/s · 8.79 k/s |