Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) vs PIC16F17146
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz against PIC16F (PIC16F17146) at 32 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
PIC16F17146
PIC16F (PIC16F17146)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- PIC16F17146 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 32 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Typical gap
140×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) faster, geometric mean of 25 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
1,141×
uint32_t multiply
Closest cell
41.0×
uint8_t add
Clock for clock
29.8×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) needs fewer cycles per op (4.69× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) is than PIC16F17146, operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead. Orange: PIC16F17146 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 41.0× 12.2 M/s · 298 k/s | 48.0× 13.3 M/s · 277 k/s | 205× 13.3 M/s · 64.8 k/s | 85.5× 5.3 M/s · 62 k/s | 263× 5.3 M/s · 20.1 k/s |
| uint16_t | 46.4× 11.3 M/s · 244 k/s | 46.4× 11.3 M/s · 244 k/s | 414× 10.5 M/s · 25.4 k/s | 210× 4.94 M/s · 23.6 k/s | 175× 4.79 M/s · 27.3 k/s |
| uint32_t | 116× 12.2 M/s · 105 k/s | 127× 11.3 M/s · 89 k/s | 1,141× 11.3 M/s · 9.9 k/s | 536× 4.94 M/s · 9.23 k/s | 457× 4.94 M/s · 10.8 k/s |
| uint64_t | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| float | 97.6× 2.43 M/s · 24.9 k/s | 131× 2.43 M/s · 18.6 k/s | 500× 2.98 M/s · 5.95 k/s | 137× 758 k/s · 5.51 k/s | 156× 1.14 M/s · 7.33 k/s |
| double | 48.7× 1.21 M/s · 24.9 k/s | 66.7× 1.24 M/s · 18.6 k/s | 114× 678 k/s · 5.95 k/s | 71.5× 394 k/s · 5.51 k/s | 99.7× 731 k/s · 7.33 k/s |