Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) vs Nucleo G474RE
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz against Cortex-M4F (STM32G474) at 170 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Nucleo G474RE
Cortex-M4F (STM32G474)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Nucleo G474RE
- Clock
- 170 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
1.57×
Nucleo G474RE faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
1.13×
uint8_t subtract
Biggest win for Nucleo G474RE
8.47×
float divide
Clock for clock
1.38×
Nucleo G474RE needs fewer cycles per op (1.13× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) is than Nucleo G474RE, operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead. Orange: Nucleo G474RE ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1.04× 12.2 M/s · 11.7 M/s | 1.13× 13.3 M/s · 11.7 M/s | 1.13× 13.3 M/s · 11.7 M/s | 1/1.69× 5.3 M/s · 8.96 M/s | 1/1.53× 5.3 M/s · 8.1 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/1.04× 11.3 M/s · 11.7 M/s | 1/1.04× 11.3 M/s · 11.7 M/s | 1/1.12× 10.5 M/s · 11.7 M/s | 1/1.66× 4.94 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/1.58× 4.79 M/s · 7.56 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/1.03× 12.2 M/s · 12.6 M/s | 1/1.12× 11.3 M/s · 12.6 M/s | 1/1.12× 11.3 M/s · 12.6 M/s | 1/1.77× 4.94 M/s · 8.73 M/s | 1/1.68× 4.94 M/s · 8.3 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1.08× 8.2 M/s · 7.56 M/s | 1.08× 8.2 M/s · 7.56 M/s | 1.11× 7.39 M/s · 6.67 M/s | 1/1.41× 822 k/s · 1.16 M/s | 1/1.46× 794 k/s · 1.16 M/s |
| float | 1/4.83× 2.43 M/s · 11.7 M/s | 1/4.83× 2.43 M/s · 11.7 M/s | 1/3.95× 2.98 M/s · 11.7 M/s | 1/8.47× 758 k/s · 6.42 M/s | 1/1.17× 1.14 M/s · 1.34 M/s |
| double | 1/1.30× 1.21 M/s · 1.58 M/s | 1/1.27× 1.24 M/s · 1.58 M/s | 1/3.28× 678 k/s · 2.22 M/s | 1/4.24× 394 k/s · 1.67 M/s | 1.06× 731 k/s · 688 k/s |