Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) vs Pi Pico
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz against Cortex-M0+ (RP2040) at 200 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Pi Pico
Cortex-M0+ (RP2040)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Pi Pico
- Clock
- 200 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
1.09×
Pi Pico faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
2.36×
uint64_t multiply
Biggest win for Pi Pico
2.65×
float divide
Clock for clock
1.23×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) needs fewer cycles per op (1.33× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) is than Pi Pico, operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead. Orange: Pi Pico ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/1.11× 12.2 M/s · 13.5 M/s | 1/1.09× 13.3 M/s · 14.5 M/s | 1.05× 13.3 M/s · 12.7 M/s | 1.11× 5.3 M/s · 4.78 M/s | 1.11× 5.3 M/s · 4.78 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1.06× 11.3 M/s · 10.7 M/s | 1.06× 11.3 M/s · 10.7 M/s | 1/1.07× 10.5 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.04× 4.94 M/s · 4.77 M/s | 1.00× 4.79 M/s · 4.77 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1.09× 12.2 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.00× 11.3 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/1.06× 11.3 M/s · 11.9 M/s | 1/1.04× 4.94 M/s · 5.14 M/s | 1/1.04× 4.94 M/s · 5.14 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1.27× 8.2 M/s · 6.44 M/s | 1.36× 8.2 M/s · 6.05 M/s | 2.36× 7.39 M/s · 3.13 M/s | 1/2.44× 822 k/s · 2.01 M/s | 1/2.53× 794 k/s · 2.01 M/s |
| float | 1.13× 2.43 M/s · 2.16 M/s | 1.21× 2.43 M/s · 2 M/s | 1.21× 2.98 M/s · 2.45 M/s | 1/2.65× 758 k/s · 2.01 M/s | 1.00× 1.14 M/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 1/1.32× 1.21 M/s · 1.6 M/s | 1/1.19× 1.24 M/s · 1.48 M/s | 1/1.50× 678 k/s · 1.02 M/s | 1/2.35× 394 k/s · 926 k/s | 1/1.00× 731 k/s · 734 k/s |