Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) vs XIAO MG24
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz against Cortex-M33 (EFR32MG24) at 39 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
XIAO MG24
Cortex-M33 (EFR32MG24)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- XIAO MG24 Sense
- Clock
- 39 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
2.56×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
5.28×
uint8_t multiply
Biggest win for XIAO MG24
2.04×
float divide
Clock for clock
1.50×
XIAO MG24 needs fewer cycles per op (3.85× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) is than XIAO MG24, operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead. Orange: XIAO MG24 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 4.51× 12.2 M/s · 2.71 M/s | 4.91× 13.3 M/s · 2.71 M/s | 5.28× 13.3 M/s · 2.52 M/s | 2.17× 5.3 M/s · 2.44 M/s | 2.77× 5.3 M/s · 1.92 M/s |
| uint16_t | 3.84× 11.3 M/s · 2.94 M/s | 3.86× 11.3 M/s · 2.93 M/s | 3.59× 10.5 M/s · 2.93 M/s | 2.37× 4.94 M/s · 2.09 M/s | 2.70× 4.79 M/s · 1.77 M/s |
| uint32_t | 3.83× 12.2 M/s · 3.19 M/s | 3.54× 11.3 M/s · 3.19 M/s | 3.85× 11.3 M/s · 2.93 M/s | 2.24× 4.94 M/s · 2.21 M/s | 2.52× 4.94 M/s · 1.96 M/s |
| uint64_t | 3.48× 8.2 M/s · 2.36 M/s | 3.48× 8.2 M/s · 2.36 M/s | 3.76× 7.39 M/s · 1.97 M/s | 2.89× 822 k/s · 285 k/s | 2.79× 794 k/s · 285 k/s |
| float | 1/1.31× 2.43 M/s · 3.18 M/s | 1/1.31× 2.43 M/s · 3.18 M/s | 1/1.07× 2.98 M/s · 3.18 M/s | 1/2.04× 758 k/s · 1.54 M/s | 3.60× 1.14 M/s · 318 k/s |
| double | 3.28× 1.21 M/s · 370 k/s | 3.37× 1.24 M/s · 368 k/s | 1.35× 678 k/s · 503 k/s | 1.04× 394 k/s · 379 k/s | 4.43× 731 k/s · 165 k/s |