Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) vs dsPIC33AK512
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz against dsPIC33A (dsPIC33AK512MPS506) at 200 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
dsPIC33AK512
dsPIC33A (dsPIC33AK512MPS506)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- dsPIC33AK512MPS506 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 200 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Typical gap
1.73×
dsPIC33AK512 faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
8.29×
uint64_t divide
Biggest win for dsPIC33AK512
16.1×
double divide
Clock for clock
1.30×
dsPIC33AK512 needs fewer cycles per op (1.33× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) is than dsPIC33AK512, operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead. Orange: dsPIC33AK512 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/1.41× 12.2 M/s · 17.3 M/s | 1/1.30× 13.3 M/s · 17.3 M/s | 1/1.30× 13.3 M/s · 17.3 M/s | 1/1.75× 5.3 M/s · 9.26 M/s | 1/1.48× 5.3 M/s · 7.81 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/1.13× 11.3 M/s · 12.8 M/s | 1/1.13× 11.3 M/s · 12.8 M/s | 1/1.51× 10.5 M/s · 15.9 M/s | 1/1.87× 4.94 M/s · 9.26 M/s | 1/1.63× 4.79 M/s · 7.81 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1.20× 12.2 M/s · 10.2 M/s | 1.11× 11.3 M/s · 10.2 M/s | 1/1.07× 11.3 M/s · 12.1 M/s | 1/1.52× 4.94 M/s · 7.52 M/s | 1/1.37× 4.94 M/s · 6.76 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1/1.18× 8.2 M/s · 9.71 M/s | 1/1.18× 8.2 M/s · 9.71 M/s | 1.20× 7.39 M/s · 6.14 M/s | 8.29× 822 k/s · 99.2 k/s | 7.96× 794 k/s · 99.8 k/s |
| float | 1/3.49× 2.43 M/s · 8.48 M/s | 1/3.49× 2.43 M/s · 8.48 M/s | 1/2.85× 2.98 M/s · 8.48 M/s | 1/8.36× 758 k/s · 6.33 M/s | 1/1.73× 1.14 M/s · 1.98 M/s |
| double | 1/6.99× 1.21 M/s · 8.48 M/s | 1/6.82× 1.24 M/s · 8.48 M/s | 1/12.5× 678 k/s · 8.48 M/s | 1/16.1× 394 k/s · 6.33 M/s | 1/2.71× 731 k/s · 1.98 M/s |