dsPIC33AK512 vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
dsPIC33A (dsPIC33AK512MPS506) at 200 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
dsPIC33AK512
dsPIC33A (dsPIC33AK512MPS506)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- dsPIC33AK512MPS506 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 200 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
1.73×
dsPIC33AK512 faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for dsPIC33AK512
16.1×
double divide
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
8.29×
uint64_t divide
Clock for clock
1.30×
dsPIC33AK512 needs fewer cycles per op (1.33× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster dsPIC33AK512 is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: dsPIC33AK512 ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1.41× 17.3 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1.30× 17.3 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1.30× 17.3 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1.75× 9.26 M/s · 5.3 M/s | 1.48× 7.81 M/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1.13× 12.8 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.13× 12.8 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.51× 15.9 M/s · 10.5 M/s | 1.87× 9.26 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1.63× 7.81 M/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/1.20× 10.2 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/1.11× 10.2 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.07× 12.1 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.52× 7.52 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1.37× 6.76 M/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1.18× 9.71 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1.18× 9.71 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/1.20× 6.14 M/s · 7.39 M/s | 1/8.29× 99.2 k/s · 822 k/s | 1/7.96× 99.8 k/s · 794 k/s |
| float | 3.49× 8.48 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 3.49× 8.48 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 2.85× 8.48 M/s · 2.98 M/s | 8.36× 6.33 M/s · 758 k/s | 1.73× 1.98 M/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 6.99× 8.48 M/s · 1.21 M/s | 6.82× 8.48 M/s · 1.24 M/s | 12.5× 8.48 M/s · 678 k/s | 16.1× 6.33 M/s · 394 k/s | 2.71× 1.98 M/s · 731 k/s |