Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) vs PIC24FJ64GU205
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz against PIC24F (PIC24FJ64GU205) at 32 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
PIC24FJ64GU205
PIC24F (PIC24FJ64GU205)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- PIC24FJ64GU205 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 32 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Typical gap
17.0×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
376×
uint64_t divide
Closest cell
4.17×
double multiply
Clock for clock
3.63×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) needs fewer cycles per op (4.69× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) is than PIC24FJ64GU205, operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead. Orange: PIC24FJ64GU205 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 8.57× 12.2 M/s · 1.43 M/s | 9.34× 13.3 M/s · 1.43 M/s | 10.2× 13.3 M/s · 1.31 M/s | 10.7× 5.3 M/s · 497 k/s | 10.7× 5.3 M/s · 497 k/s |
| uint16_t | 9.87× 11.3 M/s · 1.15 M/s | 9.87× 11.3 M/s · 1.15 M/s | 9.18× 10.5 M/s · 1.15 M/s | 10.2× 4.94 M/s · 485 k/s | 9.86× 4.79 M/s · 485 k/s |
| uint32_t | 13.7× 12.2 M/s · 890 k/s | 12.7× 11.3 M/s · 890 k/s | 17.6× 11.3 M/s · 641 k/s | 144× 4.94 M/s · 34.3 k/s | 146× 4.94 M/s · 33.8 k/s |
| uint64_t | 14.3× 8.2 M/s · 572 k/s | 12.3× 8.2 M/s · 668 k/s | 55.5× 7.39 M/s · 133 k/s | 376× 822 k/s · 2.19 k/s | 364× 794 k/s · 2.18 k/s |
| float | 18.3× 2.43 M/s · 133 k/s | 20.0× 2.43 M/s · 122 k/s | 17.8× 2.98 M/s · 168 k/s | 9.68× 758 k/s · 78.2 k/s | 11.9× 1.14 M/s · 96.3 k/s |
| double | 9.36× 1.21 M/s · 130 k/s | 10.4× 1.24 M/s · 119 k/s | 4.17× 678 k/s · 162 k/s | 5.11× 394 k/s · 77.1 k/s | 7.73× 731 k/s · 94.5 k/s |