PIC24FJ64GU205 vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
PIC24F (PIC24FJ64GU205) at 32 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
PIC24FJ64GU205
PIC24F (PIC24FJ64GU205)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- PIC24FJ64GU205 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 32 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
17.0×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for PIC24FJ64GU205
0.24×
double multiply
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
376×
uint64_t divide
Clock for clock
3.63×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) needs fewer cycles per op (4.69× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster PIC24FJ64GU205 is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: PIC24FJ64GU205 ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/8.57× 1.43 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/9.34× 1.43 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/10.2× 1.31 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/10.7× 497 k/s · 5.3 M/s | 1/10.7× 497 k/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/9.87× 1.15 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/9.87× 1.15 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/9.18× 1.15 M/s · 10.5 M/s | 1/10.2× 485 k/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/9.86× 485 k/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/13.7× 890 k/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/12.7× 890 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/17.6× 641 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/144× 34.3 k/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/146× 33.8 k/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1/14.3× 572 k/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/12.3× 668 k/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/55.5× 133 k/s · 7.39 M/s | 1/376× 2.19 k/s · 822 k/s | 1/364× 2.18 k/s · 794 k/s |
| float | 1/18.3× 133 k/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/20.0× 122 k/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/17.8× 168 k/s · 2.98 M/s | 1/9.68× 78.2 k/s · 758 k/s | 1/11.9× 96.3 k/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 1/9.36× 130 k/s · 1.21 M/s | 1/10.4× 119 k/s · 1.24 M/s | 1/4.17× 162 k/s · 678 k/s | 1/5.11× 77.1 k/s · 394 k/s | 1/7.73× 94.5 k/s · 731 k/s |