XIAO MG24 vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Cortex-M33 (EFR32MG24) at 39 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
XIAO MG24
Cortex-M33 (EFR32MG24)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- XIAO MG24 Sense
- Clock
- 39 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
2.56×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for XIAO MG24
2.04×
float divide
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
5.28×
uint8_t multiply
Clock for clock
1.50×
XIAO MG24 needs fewer cycles per op (3.85× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster XIAO MG24 is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: XIAO MG24 ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/4.51× 2.71 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/4.91× 2.71 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/5.28× 2.52 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/2.17× 2.44 M/s · 5.3 M/s | 1/2.77× 1.92 M/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/3.84× 2.94 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/3.86× 2.93 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/3.59× 2.93 M/s · 10.5 M/s | 1/2.37× 2.09 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/2.70× 1.77 M/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/3.83× 3.19 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/3.54× 3.19 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/3.85× 2.93 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/2.24× 2.21 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/2.52× 1.96 M/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1/3.48× 2.36 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/3.48× 2.36 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/3.76× 1.97 M/s · 7.39 M/s | 1/2.89× 285 k/s · 822 k/s | 1/2.79× 285 k/s · 794 k/s |
| float | 1.31× 3.18 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 1.31× 3.18 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 1.07× 3.18 M/s · 2.98 M/s | 2.04× 1.54 M/s · 758 k/s | 1/3.60× 318 k/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 1/3.28× 370 k/s · 1.21 M/s | 1/3.37× 368 k/s · 1.24 M/s | 1/1.35× 503 k/s · 678 k/s | 1/1.04× 379 k/s · 394 k/s | 1/4.43× 165 k/s · 731 k/s |