Pi Pico vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Cortex-M0+ (RP2040) at 200 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico
Cortex-M0+ (RP2040)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Pi Pico
- Clock
- 200 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
1.09×
Pi Pico faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico
2.65×
float divide
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
2.36×
uint64_t multiply
Clock for clock
1.23×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) needs fewer cycles per op (1.33× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1.11× 13.5 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1.09× 14.5 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/1.05× 12.7 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/1.11× 4.78 M/s · 5.3 M/s | 1/1.11× 4.78 M/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/1.06× 10.7 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/1.06× 10.7 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.07× 11.3 M/s · 10.5 M/s | 1/1.04× 4.77 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/1.00× 4.77 M/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/1.09× 11.3 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/1.00× 11.3 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.06× 11.9 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.04× 5.14 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1.04× 5.14 M/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1/1.27× 6.44 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/1.36× 6.05 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/2.36× 3.13 M/s · 7.39 M/s | 2.44× 2.01 M/s · 822 k/s | 2.53× 2.01 M/s · 794 k/s |
| float | 1/1.13× 2.16 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/1.21× 2 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/1.21× 2.45 M/s · 2.98 M/s | 2.65× 2.01 M/s · 758 k/s | 1/1.00× 1.14 M/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 1.32× 1.6 M/s · 1.21 M/s | 1.19× 1.48 M/s · 1.24 M/s | 1.50× 1.02 M/s · 678 k/s | 2.35× 926 k/s · 394 k/s | 1.00× 734 k/s · 731 k/s |