Nucleo G474RE vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Cortex-M4F (STM32G474) at 170 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Nucleo G474RE
Cortex-M4F (STM32G474)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Nucleo G474RE
- Clock
- 170 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
1.57×
Nucleo G474RE faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Nucleo G474RE
8.47×
float divide
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
1.13×
uint8_t subtract
Clock for clock
1.38×
Nucleo G474RE needs fewer cycles per op (1.13× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Nucleo G474RE is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: Nucleo G474RE ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/1.04× 11.7 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/1.13× 11.7 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/1.13× 11.7 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1.69× 8.96 M/s · 5.3 M/s | 1.53× 8.1 M/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1.04× 11.7 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.04× 11.7 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.12× 11.7 M/s · 10.5 M/s | 1.66× 8.2 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1.58× 7.56 M/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1.03× 12.6 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1.12× 12.6 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.12× 12.6 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.77× 8.73 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1.68× 8.3 M/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1/1.08× 7.56 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/1.08× 7.56 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/1.11× 6.67 M/s · 7.39 M/s | 1.41× 1.16 M/s · 822 k/s | 1.46× 1.16 M/s · 794 k/s |
| float | 4.83× 11.7 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 4.83× 11.7 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 3.95× 11.7 M/s · 2.98 M/s | 8.47× 6.42 M/s · 758 k/s | 1.17× 1.34 M/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 1.30× 1.58 M/s · 1.21 M/s | 1.27× 1.58 M/s · 1.24 M/s | 3.28× 2.22 M/s · 678 k/s | 4.24× 1.67 M/s · 394 k/s | 1/1.06× 688 k/s · 731 k/s |