PIC16F17146 vs Teensy 4.0
PIC16F (PIC16F17146) at 32 MHz against Cortex-M7 (i.MX RT1062) at 600 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
PIC16F17146
PIC16F (PIC16F17146)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- PIC16F17146 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 32 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Teensy 4.0
Cortex-M7 (i.MX RT1062)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Teensy 4.0
- Clock
- 600 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
1,689×
Teensy 4.0 faster, geometric mean of 25 cells
Biggest win for PIC16F17146
0.00×
uint8_t add
Biggest win for Teensy 4.0
13,055×
float multiply
Clock for clock
90.1×
Teensy 4.0 needs fewer cycles per op (18.8× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster PIC16F17146 is than Teensy 4.0, operations per second. Blue: PIC16F17146 ahead. Orange: Teensy 4.0 ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/260× 298 k/s · 77.4 M/s | 1/272× 277 k/s · 75.3 M/s | 1/1,161× 64.8 k/s · 75.3 M/s | 1/844× 62 k/s · 52.3 M/s | 1/2,301× 20.1 k/s · 46.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/309× 244 k/s · 75.3 M/s | 1/308× 244 k/s · 75 M/s | 1/2,701× 25.4 k/s · 68.6 M/s | 1/1,758× 23.6 k/s · 41.5 M/s | 1/1,373× 27.3 k/s · 37.5 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/785× 105 k/s · 82.8 M/s | 1/963× 89 k/s · 85.7 M/s | 1/6,923× 9.9 k/s · 68.6 M/s | 1/4,263× 9.23 k/s · 39.3 M/s | 1/3,223× 10.8 k/s · 34.8 M/s |
| uint64_t | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| float | 1/3,121× 24.9 k/s · 77.7 M/s | 1/4,174× 18.6 k/s · 77.7 M/s | 1/13,055× 5.95 k/s · 77.7 M/s | 1/4,899× 5.51 k/s · 27 M/s | 1/910× 7.33 k/s · 6.67 M/s |
| double | 1/2,248× 24.9 k/s · 56 M/s | 1/2,937× 18.6 k/s · 54.7 M/s | 1/7,345× 5.95 k/s · 43.7 M/s | 1/2,846× 5.51 k/s · 15.7 M/s | 1/660× 7.33 k/s · 4.84 M/s |