MSP430FR2433 vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
MSP430FRx (MSP430FR2433) at 15.99 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
MSP430FR2433
MSP430FRx (MSP430FR2433)
- Family
- MSP430
- Board
- MSP-EXP430FR2433 LaunchPad
- Clock
- 15.99 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
78.9×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for MSP430FR2433
0.06×
uint16_t add
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
720×
double multiply
Clock for clock
8.42×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) needs fewer cycles per op (9.38× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster MSP430FR2433 is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: MSP430FR2433 ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/19.7× 621 k/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/22.3× 598 k/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/46.0× 290 k/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/61.3× 86.4 k/s · 5.3 M/s | 1/61.6× 86 k/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/17.5× 646 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/18.2× 622 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/34.0× 309 k/s · 10.5 M/s | 1/73.5× 67.3 k/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/71.5× 67 k/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/33.1× 370 k/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/28.4× 397 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/53.9× 210 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/214× 23.1 k/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/215× 23 k/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1/54.5× 151 k/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/59.8× 137 k/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/78.4× 94.3 k/s · 7.39 M/s | 1/203× 4.06 k/s · 822 k/s | 1/156× 5.1 k/s · 794 k/s |
| float | 1/144× 16.8 k/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/150× 16.2 k/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/508× 5.85 k/s · 2.98 M/s | 1/64.9× 11.7 k/s · 758 k/s | 1/53.8× 21.3 k/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 1/148× 8.18 k/s · 1.21 M/s | 1/159× 7.8 k/s · 1.24 M/s | 1/720× 942 /s · 678 k/s | 1/188× 2.1 k/s · 394 k/s | 1/83.2× 8.79 k/s · 731 k/s |