Pi Pico 2W vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Cortex-M33 (RP2350) at 150 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W
Cortex-M33 (RP2350)
- Family
- Arm Cortex-M
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
1.74×
Pi Pico 2W faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W
8.48×
float divide
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
2.42×
uint64_t divide
Clock for clock
1.74×
Pi Pico 2W needs fewer cycles per op (1.00× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Pi Pico 2W is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: Pi Pico 2W ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/1.00× 12.2 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/1.09× 12.2 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/1.18× 11.3 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1.79× 9.49 M/s · 5.3 M/s | 1.51× 7.97 M/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1.09× 12.3 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.08× 12.2 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.17× 12.3 M/s · 10.5 M/s | 1.76× 8.7 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1.55× 7.4 M/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1.09× 13.3 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1.18× 13.4 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.08× 12.3 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.86× 9.2 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1.66× 8.19 M/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1.20× 9.84 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1.20× 9.84 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1.11× 8.19 M/s · 7.39 M/s | 1/2.42× 340 k/s · 822 k/s | 1/2.34× 340 k/s · 794 k/s |
| float | 5.49× 13.4 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 5.49× 13.4 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 4.49× 13.4 M/s · 2.98 M/s | 8.48× 6.43 M/s · 758 k/s | 1.52× 1.74 M/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 4.71× 5.71 M/s · 1.21 M/s | 4.58× 5.69 M/s · 1.24 M/s | 5.11× 3.46 M/s · 678 k/s | 5.33× 2.1 M/s · 394 k/s | 1.67× 1.22 M/s · 731 k/s |