Arduino Uno vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
ATmega328P at 16 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
35.2×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for Arduino Uno
0.14×
double modulo
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
206×
uint64_t multiply
Clock for clock
3.76×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) needs fewer cycles per op (9.38× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster Arduino Uno is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: Arduino Uno ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/25.0× 490 k/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/27.2× 490 k/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/29.7× 448 k/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/37.2× 142 k/s · 5.3 M/s | 1/37.2× 142 k/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/21.7× 522 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/21.7× 522 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/25.4× 413 k/s · 10.5 M/s | 1/71.2× 69.5 k/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/68.9× 69.5 k/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/35.7× 342 k/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/33.0× 342 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/83.7× 135 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/199× 24.8 k/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/199× 24.8 k/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1/110× 74.6 k/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/110× 74.6 k/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/206× 35.9 k/s · 7.39 M/s | 1/53.8× 15.3 k/s · 822 k/s | 1/52.2× 15.2 k/s · 794 k/s |
| float | 1/24.7× 98.3 k/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/24.6× 98.7 k/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/34.2× 87 k/s · 2.98 M/s | 1/23.5× 32.2 k/s · 758 k/s | 1/11.1× 103 k/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 1/12.4× 98.1 k/s · 1.21 M/s | 1/12.6× 98.6 k/s · 1.24 M/s | 1/7.81× 86.8 k/s · 678 k/s | 1/12.2× 32.2 k/s · 394 k/s | 1/7.11× 103 k/s · 731 k/s |