ESP32-C6 vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
RV32IMAC (ESP32-C6) at 160 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
ESP32-C6
RV32IMAC (ESP32-C6)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- ESP32-C6-DevKitM-1
- Clock
- 160 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
1.15×
ESP32-C6 faster, geometric mean of 30 cells
Biggest win for ESP32-C6
2.51×
double multiply
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
1.19×
float modulo
Clock for clock
1.08×
ESP32-C6 needs fewer cycles per op (1.07× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster ESP32-C6 is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: ESP32-C6 ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1.05× 12.8 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1.05× 14 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1.05× 14 M/s · 13.3 M/s | 1.53× 8.1 M/s · 5.3 M/s | 1.55× 8.2 M/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/1.09× 10.3 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/1.09× 10.3 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.05× 11.1 M/s · 10.5 M/s | 1.49× 7.35 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1.55× 7.43 M/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1.05× 12.8 M/s · 12.2 M/s | 1.05× 11.9 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.05× 11.9 M/s · 11.3 M/s | 1.49× 7.35 M/s · 4.94 M/s | 1.50× 7.43 M/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | 1/1.00× 8.2 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1.05× 8.65 M/s · 8.2 M/s | 1/1.04× 7.1 M/s · 7.39 M/s | 1.23× 1.01 M/s · 822 k/s | 1.24× 986 k/s · 794 k/s |
| float | 1/1.01× 2.4 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/1.06× 2.29 M/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/1.10× 2.7 M/s · 2.98 M/s | 1.19× 905 k/s · 758 k/s | 1/1.19× 959 k/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 1.15× 1.39 M/s · 1.21 M/s | 1.09× 1.35 M/s · 1.24 M/s | 2.51× 1.7 M/s · 678 k/s | 1.25× 492 k/s · 394 k/s | 1/1.13× 647 k/s · 731 k/s |