PIC18F57Q84 vs Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
PIC18F (PIC18F57Q84) at 64 MHz against Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350) at 150 MHz, on real hardware, same C kernels, clocks verified.
PIC18F57Q84
PIC18F (PIC18F57Q84)
- Family
- PIC / dsPIC
- Board
- PIC18F57Q84 Curiosity Nano
- Clock
- 64 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 32-bit
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
Hazard3 RV32IMAC (RP2350)
- Family
- RISC-V
- Board
- Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
- Clock
- 150 MHz
- float / double
- 32-bit / 64-bit
Typical gap
55.7×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) faster, geometric mean of 25 cells
Biggest win for PIC18F57Q84
0.04×
uint8_t add
Biggest win for Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V)
482×
uint32_t multiply
Clock for clock
23.8×
Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) needs fewer cycles per op (2.34× clock gap)
Operation by operation
Every cell
How many times faster PIC18F57Q84 is than Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V), operations per second. Blue: PIC18F57Q84 ahead. Orange: Pi Pico 2W (RISC-V) ahead.
| Add | Subtract | Multiply | Divide | Modulo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uint8_t | 1/22.7× 538 k/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/26.4× 504 k/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/25.6× 520 k/s · 13.3 M/s | 1/39.1× 135 k/s · 5.3 M/s | 1/49.9× 106 k/s · 5.3 M/s |
| uint16_t | 1/34.4× 328 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/34.4× 328 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/36.6× 287 k/s · 10.5 M/s | 1/79.6× 62.1 k/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/67.8× 70.6 k/s · 4.79 M/s |
| uint32_t | 1/51.0× 240 k/s · 12.2 M/s | 1/47.2× 240 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/482× 23.5 k/s · 11.3 M/s | 1/202× 24.5 k/s · 4.94 M/s | 1/173× 28.6 k/s · 4.94 M/s |
| uint64_t | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| float | 1/65.0× 37.4 k/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/76.7× 31.7 k/s · 2.43 M/s | 1/132× 22.6 k/s · 2.98 M/s | 1/74.3× 10.2 k/s · 758 k/s | 1/57.8× 19.8 k/s · 1.14 M/s |
| double | 1/32.4× 37.4 k/s · 1.21 M/s | 1/39.2× 31.7 k/s · 1.24 M/s | 1/30.1× 22.6 k/s · 678 k/s | 1/38.6× 10.2 k/s · 394 k/s | 1/36.9× 19.8 k/s · 731 k/s |